|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Evidence-based Policy: The Promise of `Realist Synthesis'
Ray Pawson
Queen Mary University of London, UK, r.d.pawson{at}leeds.ac.uk
Evaluation research is tortured by time constraints. The policy cycle revolves more quickly than the research cycle, with the result that `real time' evaluations often have little influence on policy making. As a result, the quest for evidence-based policy (EBP) has turned increasingly to systematic reviews of the results of previous inquiries in the relevant policy domain. However, this shifting of the temporal frame for evaluation is in itself no guarantee of success. Evidence, whether new or old, never speaks for itself. Accordingly, there is debate about the best strategy of marshalling bygone research results into the policy process. In the first of this pair of articles (published in the previous issue of Evaluation) a critical review of the existing EBP strategies was conducted. This companion article considers the merits of a new methodology for systematic reviews, namely `realist synthesis'.
Key Words: evidence-based policy • incentives • realism • systematic review
Evaluation, Vol. 8, No. 3,
340-358 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/135638902401462448
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
C.M. Klein Haarhuis and E. Niemeijer
Synthesizing Legislative Evaluations: Putting the Pieces Together
Evaluation,
October 1, 2009;
15(4):
403 - 425.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Nutley, I. Walter, and H. T. O. Davies
Promoting Evidence-based Practice: Models and Mechanisms From Cross-Sector Review
Research on Social Work Practice,
September 1, 2009;
19(5):
552 - 559.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-U. Otto, A. Polutta, and H. Ziegler
Reflexive Professionalism as a Second Generation of Evidence-Based Practice: Some Considerations on the Special Issue "What Works? Modernizing the Knowledge-Base of Social Work"
Research on Social Work Practice,
July 1, 2009;
19(4):
472 - 478.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Naaldenberg, L. Vaandrager, M. Koelen, A.-M. Wagemakers, H. Saan, and K. de Hoog
Elaborating on systems thinking in health promotion practice
Global Health Promotion,
March 1, 2009;
16(1):
39 - 47.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Suri and D. Clarke
Advancements in Research Synthesis Methods: From a Methodologically Inclusive Perspective
Review of Educational Research,
March 1, 2009;
79(1):
395 - 430.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. K{oelig}nig
Realistic Evaluation and Case Studies: Stretching the Potential
Evaluation,
January 1, 2009;
15(1):
9 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Blackman
Can smoking cessation services be better targeted to tackle health inequalities? Evidence from a cross-sectional study
Health Education Journal,
June 1, 2008;
67(2):
91 - 101.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Stame
The European Project, Federalism and Evaluation
Evaluation,
April 1, 2008;
14(2):
117 - 140.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. van der Knaap, F. L. Leeuw, S. Bogaerts, and L. T. J. Nijssen
Combining Campbell Standards and the Realist Evaluation Approach: The Best of Two Worlds?
American Journal of Evaluation,
March 1, 2008;
29(1):
48 - 57.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Timperley and A. Alton-Lee
Reframing Teacher Professional Learning: An Alternative Policy Approach to Strengthening Valued Outcomes for Diverse Learners
Review of Research in Education,
February 1, 2008;
32(1):
328 - 369.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Leone
Realistic Evaluation of an Illicit Drug Deterrence Programme: Analysis of a Case Study
Evaluation,
January 1, 2008;
14(1):
9 - 28.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Blamey and M. Mackenzie
Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation: Peas in a Pod or Apples and Oranges?
Evaluation,
October 1, 2007;
13(4):
439 - 455.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Maatta and K. Rantala
The Evaluator as a Critical Interpreter: Comparing Evaluations of Multi-Actor Drug Prevention Policy
Evaluation,
October 1, 2007;
13(4):
457 - 476.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Clark, P. D. MacIntyre, and J. Cruickshank
A critical realist approach to understanding and evaluating heart health programmes
Health (London) ,
October 1, 2007;
11(4):
513 - 539.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Befani, S. Ledermann, and F. Sager
Realistic Evaluation and QCA: Conceptual Parallels and an Empirical Application
Evaluation,
April 1, 2007;
13(2):
171 - 192.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Walker
Entropy and the Evaluation of Labour Market Interventions
Evaluation,
April 1, 2007;
13(2):
193 - 219.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Braye and M. Preston-Shoot
On Systematic Reviews in Social Work: Observations from Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Law in Social Work Education
Br. J. Soc. Work,
February 1, 2007;
37(2):
313 - 334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Penn and E. Lloyd
using systematic reviews to investigate research in early childhood
Journal of Early Childhood Research,
October 1, 2006;
4(3):
311 - 330.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Brooks-Gordon and C. Bilby
Psychological interventions for treatment of adult sex offenders.
BMJ,
July 1, 2006;
333(7557):
5 - 6.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Oliver, A. Harden, R. Rees, J. Shepherd, G. Brunton, J. Garcia, and A. Oakley
An Emerging Framework for Including Different Types of Evidence in Systematic Reviews for Public Policy
Evaluation,
October 1, 2005;
11(4):
428 - 446.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. F. Hansen
Choosing Evaluation Models: A Discussion on Evaluation Design
Evaluation,
October 1, 2005;
11(4):
447 - 462.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Ashworth, A. Cebulla, D. Greenberg, and R. Walker
Meta-Evaluation: Discovering What Works Best in Welfare Provision
Evaluation,
April 1, 2004;
10(2):
193 - 216.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Hills, S. Carroll, and M. O'Neill
Vers un modele d'evaluation de l'efficacite des interventions communautaires en promotion de la sante : compte-rendu de quelques developpements Nord-americains recents1
Global Health Promotion,
March 1, 2004;
11(1_suppl):
17 - 21.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Stame
Theory-Based Evaluation and Types of Complexity
Evaluation,
January 1, 2004;
10(1):
58 - 76.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Pawson
Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory
Evaluation,
October 1, 2003;
9(4):
471 - 490.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
