|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Interface between Evaluation and Public Policy
Carol Hirschon Weiss
Harvard University
Evaluation has much to offer to policy makers, but policy makers rarely base new policies directly on evaluation results. Partly this is because of the compedting pressures of interests, ideologies, other information and institutional constraints. Partly it is because many policies take shape over time through the actions of many officials in many offices, each of which does its job without conscious reflection. Despite the seeming neglect of evaluation, scholars in many countries have found that evaluation has real consequences: it challenges old ideas, provides new perspectives and helps to re-order the policy agenda. This kind of 'enlightenment' is difficult to see, and it works best when it receives support from policy champions. Many channels bring evaluation results to the attention of policy makers, and they listen not only because they want direction but also to justify policies, to show their knowledge and modernity, and as a counterweight to other information. Openness of the political system and a thriving evaluation community tend to make some nations more attuned to evaluation-than others.
Evaluation, Vol. 5, No. 4,
468-486 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/135638909900500408
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
N. Spicer and P. Smith
Evaluating Complex, Area-Based Initiatives in a Context of Change: The Experience of the Children's Fund Initiative
Evaluation,
January 1, 2008;
14(1):
75 - 90.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Fjellstrom
A Learner-Focused Evaluation Strategy: Developing Medical Education through a Deliberative Dialogue with Stakeholders
Evaluation,
January 1, 2008;
14(1):
91 - 106.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Swanwick
Introducing Large-Scale Educational Reform in a Complex Environment: The Role of Piloting and Evaluation in Modernizing Medical Careers
Evaluation,
July 1, 2007;
13(3):
358 - 370.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Hansson
Organizational Use of Evaluations: Governance and Control in Research Evaluation
Evaluation,
April 1, 2006;
12(2):
159 - 178.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Martin
Speeches and Addresses : Evaluation, Inspection and the Improvement Agenda: Contrasting Fortunes in an Era of Evidence-Based Policy-Making
Evaluation,
October 1, 2005;
11(4):
496 - 504.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lehtonen
OECD Environmental Performance Review Programme: Accountability (f)or Learning?
Evaluation,
April 1, 2005;
11(2):
169 - 188.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Simons
Utilizing Evaluation Evidence to Enhance Professional Practice
Evaluation,
October 1, 2004;
10(4):
410 - 429.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Sanderson
Getting Evidence into Practice: Perspectives on Rationality
Evaluation,
July 1, 2004;
10(3):
366 - 379.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Alexander
Health-Service Evaluations: Should We Expect the Results to Change Practice?
Evaluation,
October 1, 2003;
9(4):
405 - 414.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. F. Frederiksen, F. Hansson, and S. B. Wenneberg
The Agora and the Role of Research Evaluation
Evaluation,
April 1, 2003;
9(2):
149 - 172.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Chacon-Moscoso, M. T. Anguera-Argilaga, J. A. Perez-Gil, and F. P. Holgado-Tello
A Mutual Catalytic Model of Formative Evaluation: The Interdependent Roles of Evaluators and Local Programme Practitioners
Evaluation,
October 1, 2002;
8(4):
413 - 432.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Vartiainen
On the Principles of Comparative Evaluation
Evaluation,
July 1, 2002;
8(3):
359 - 371.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Nutley, I. Walter, and N. Bland
The Institutional Arrangements for Connecting Evidence and Policy: the Case of Drug Misuse
Public Policy and Administration,
July 1, 2002;
17(3):
76 - 94.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Perrin
How to -- and How Not to -- Evaluate Innovation
Evaluation,
January 1, 2002;
8(1):
13 - 28.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Whitelaw, A. Baxendale, C. Bryce, L. MacHardy, I. Young, and E. Witney
Settings' based health promotion: a review
Health Promot. Int.,
December 1, 2001;
16(4):
339 - 353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Mays, S. Wyke, and D. Evans
The Evaluation of Complex Health Policy: Lessons from the UK Total Purchasing Experiment
Evaluation,
October 1, 2001;
7(4):
405 - 426.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Wimbush and J. Watson
An Evaluation Framework for Health Promotion: Theory, Quality and Effectiveness
Evaluation,
July 1, 2000;
6(3):
301 - 321.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
