This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Boaz, A. Articles by Hayden, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Pro-active Evaluators: Enabling Research to Be Useful, Usable and Used

Queen Mary College, University of London, UK, a.l.boaz{at}qmul.ac.uk

Carol Hayden

Audit Commission, UK, c-hayden{at}audit-commission.gov.uk

Evidence-based policy making presents challenges for researchers as the pragmatic imperative of delivering `the right information, at the right time, for the right people' can appear to compromise traditional academic roles and responsibilities. Using the recent evaluation of the UK Cabinet Office-led `Better Government for Older People' programme as a case study, we discuss attempts to meet these challenges in practice. Our experience confirms that there has been a shift from the assumption of rational models (i.e. that evidence will be used as part of a linear planning process) to a more `realistic' perspective in which evidence from research requires advocates to promote its potential contribution. In turn, this suggests that it is in the interest of the research community to try to understand the policy-making process, and so design, undertake and disseminate their research in a way that maximizes the likelihood of its use in actively contributing to policy development.

Key Words: action research • evidence-based policy • policy evaluation • role of the evaluator • utilization

Evaluation, Vol. 8, No. 4, 440-453 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/13563890260620630


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Spicer and P. Smith Evaluating Complex, Area-Based Initiatives in a Context of Change: The Experience of the Children's Fund Initiative Evaluation, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 75 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lehtonen Deliberative Democracy, Participation, and OECD Peer Reviews of Environmental Policies American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2006; 27(2): 185 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Allen and M. Black Dual Level Evaluation and Complex Community Initiatives: The Local Evaluation of Sure Start Evaluation, April 1, 2006; 12(2): 237 - 249. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Rolfsen and H. Torvatn How to 'Get Through': Communication Challenges in Formative Evaluation Evaluation, July 1, 2005; 11(3): 297 - 309. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Sanderson Getting Evidence into Practice: Perspectives on Rationality Evaluation, July 1, 2004; 10(3): 366 - 379. [PDF]