This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Valovirta, V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evaluation Utilization as Argumentation

Net Effect Ltd, Finland, ville.valovirta{at}neffect.net

Evaluation utilization is discussed in this article from an argumentative perspective. Rather than regarding evaluative information as indisputable knowledge, it is viewed as a collection of arguments, which can be debated, accepted and disputed. Approaching from this perspective, evaluations consist of different kinds of statements, which become matters of individual interpretation, collective argumentation and decision making in interactional contexts. Subsequently, a general framework for studying argumentation in evaluation will be proposed. The argumentative nature of evaluation utilization is then illustrated with empirical material from evaluations of government agencies in Finland. The article concludes by discussing the implications of the evaluation context for argumentation: two dimensions, the degree of pressure for change and the relation between conflict and consensus, seem to profoundly affect the role evaluations play within the management environment of the agencies.

Key Words: argumentation • evaluation context • evaluation use • interpretation • reasoning in evaluation • social interaction

Evaluation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 60-80 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1358902002008001487


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hurteau, S. Houle, and S. Mongiat How Legitimate and Justified are Judgments in Program Evaluation? Evaluation, July 1, 2009; 15(3): 307 - 319. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Balthasar Institutional Design and Utilization of Evaluation: A Contribution to a Theory of Evaluation Influence Based on Swiss Experience Eval Rev, June 1, 2009; 33(3): 226 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. A. Abma and G. A.M. Widdershoven Evaluation and/as Social Relation Evaluation, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 209 - 225. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Bezzi Evaluation Pragmatics Evaluation, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 56 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lehtonen OECD Environmental Performance Review Programme: Accountability (f)or Learning? Evaluation, April 1, 2005; 11(2): 169 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Halliday, S. N. M. Asthana, and S. Richardson Evaluating Partnership: The Role of Formal Assessment Tools Evaluation, July 1, 2004; 10(3): 285 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]