This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Walker, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Great Expectations: Can Social Science Evaluate New Labour's Policies?

University of Nottingham, UK

The UK Labour government has offered a hand of friendship to the academic research community and to social science in particular. It has rejected anti-intellectualism in government and sought to promote policy made on the basis of evidence. In particular, it has introduced piloting of policies prior to national implementation. This article draws on the experience of four of the largest pilot evaluations undertaken to date, and considers the extent to which the research community has been able to contribute effectively to determining whether Labour's policies work. Five sets of inhibitors are identified and discussed relating to the policy-making process, the characteristics of particular policies, the mechanisms for commissioning and also designing evaluations and the orientation of the social science community. The article concludes that success to date has been severely limited and that to continue evaluating new policies as at present is unsustainable. Evidence-based policy cannot be limited to the use of evidence; policy making has to accommodate the production of evidence. An alternative scenario is presented that might facilitate such an accommodation.

Key Words: Britain • effective evaluation • evidence-based policy • politics • Welfare to Work

Evaluation, Vol. 7, No. 3, 305-330 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/13563890122209702


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Callaghan Evaluation and Negotiated Order: Developing the Application of Complexity Theory Evaluation, October 1, 2008; 14(4): 399 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Callaghan and G. Wistow Can the community construct knowledge to shape services in the local state? A case study Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2008; 28(2): 165 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Peel and G. Lloyd Re-generating Learning in the Public Realm: Evidence-based Policy Making and Business Improvement Districts in the UK Public Policy and Administration, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 189 - 205. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Walker Entropy and the Evaluation of Labour Market Interventions Evaluation, April 1, 2007; 13(2): 193 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Pollitt Performance Information for Democracy: The Missing Link? Evaluation, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 38 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Mackenzie and A. Blamey The Practice and the Theory: Lessons from the Application of a Theories of Change Approach Evaluation, April 1, 2005; 11(2): 151 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Sanderson Getting Evidence into Practice: Perspectives on Rationality Evaluation, July 1, 2004; 10(3): 366 - 379. [PDF]

				I. Sanderson Making Sense of 'What Works': Evidence Based Policy Making as Instrumental Rationality? Public Policy and Administration, July 1, 2002; 17(3): 61 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF]