Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pawson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tilley, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Caring Communities, Paradigm Polemics, Design Debates

Ray Pawson

Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds

Nick Tilley

Crime and Social Research Unit, Nottingham Trent University

In a previous issue of this journal (Vol. 3, no. 2) David Farrington introduced—‘in the interests of stimulating discussions’—an outline research design for Evaluating a Community Crime Prevention Program. This article takes up the challenge, offers a critique of his ‘quasi-experimental’ approach and insists that such programs are better evaluated using designs based on ‘scientific realist’ principles. The paper also draws attention to benefits of a ‘theories of change’ approach to evaluation, pioneered in the US in conjunction with such comprehensive community initiatives.

Evaluation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 73-90 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/13563899822208400
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EvaluationHome page
P. Burton
Conceptual, Theoretical and Practical Issues in Measuring the Benefits of Public Participation
Evaluation, July 1, 2009; 15(3): 263 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal JusticeHome page
P. Raynor
Community penalties and Home Office research: On the way back to `nothing works'?
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 73 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal JusticeHome page
N. Tilley
Applying theory-driven evaluation to the British Crime Reduction Programme: The theories of the programme and of its evaluations
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, August 1, 2004; 4(3): 255 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
D. P. Farrington
Methodological Quality Standards for Evaluation Research
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2003; 587(1): 49 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
P. Dahler-Larsen
From Programme Theory to Constructivism: On Tragic, Magic and Competing Programmes
Evaluation, July 1, 2001; 7(3): 331 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
J. O'Hara and G. McNamara
Evaluation: Business or Vocation?
Evaluation, October 1, 1999; 5(4): 497 - 502.
[PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
D. P. Farrington
Evaluating 'Communities that Care': Realistic Scientific Considerations
Evaluation, April 1, 1998; 4(2): 204 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]