Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluation in Health and Social Care

Exploring Lost Dimensions

Ian Shaw

University of Nottingham

Political disillusionment in the ability of the UK welfare state to impact significantly upon disadvantage and poverty has led to a shift in focus away from achieving positive change and towards the maintenance of social problems at manageable levels. The issue this shift has raised is the level at which disadvantage and other social problems should be maintained. This change of emphasis has indicated a move away from the realization of service goals and towards the use of economy and efficiency as main evaluation criteria. This has been assisted by the introduction of quasi- market reforms and the weakening of the influence of professionals over quality issues in service delivery. The paper argues that differences exist between the key stakeholders in both health and social services but that 'traditional' evaluation has served to mask these differences. This is assisted by a lack of publicly declared service aims and the management capture of definitions of service issues such as quality. Evaluation in health and social care is increasingly focused on outcomes and performance indicators. This approach treats the service as a separate variable which can be separated out for study and consequently ignores the key factor of context. The context of evaluation is important in services which aim to create change in society. Inclusion of context also has the potential of placing a regulatory framework on the pursuit of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.

Evaluation, Vol. 3, No. 4, 469-480 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/135638909700300406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?