Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Public Policy Evaluation in a Centralized State

A Case-Study of Social Assistance in the United Kingdom

Robert Walker

Loughborough University

One feature of heavily centralized government with nationally uniform policies is the limited scope for policy experimentation. Policies cannot readily be trialled and there is little opportunity to learn from small scale implementation. Increasing centralization in Britain has been accompanied by a developing managerial ethos within central government. HM Treasury has demanded that new policies be given explicit objectives and an evaluation strategy be implemented. The inability to use randomized controls has led to creative evaluation strategies that stress the understanding of process rather than the measurement of outcome. With the desire to tighten further Government's grip on public expenditure, the demand is now for pilot schemes and impact analysis. Focusing on social assistance, the paper details the changing environment of policy evaluation in Britain, reviews non experimental methods that have been used and documents the first two policy pilots. The paper concludes with a discussion of the opportunities and dangers arising from the move towards experimentation.

Evaluation, Vol. 3, No. 3, 261-279 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/135638909700300302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
C. Segerholm
Researching Evaluation in National (State) Politics and Administration: A Critical Approach
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2003; 24(3): 353 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
R. Walker
Great Expectations: Can Social Science Evaluate New Labour's Policies?
Evaluation, July 1, 2001; 7(3): 305 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]