|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Anything Goes
Evaluation and Relativism
Clem Adelman
University of Reading
Although evaluators have devised a range of ethical and methodological approaches to evaluation, most have assumed a Weberian construct regarding organizations. Evaluators have tended to avoid judgemental data on the use of power and authority in organizations and have taken refuge in various relativistic discourses. Attempts to deal with these problems, such as 'portrayal of persons' and case study, are considered.
Evaluation, Vol. 2, No. 3,
291-305 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/135638909600200304

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Maatta and K. Rantala
The Evaluator as a Critical Interpreter: Comparing Evaluations of Multi-Actor Drug Prevention Policy
Evaluation,
October 1, 2007;
13(4):
457 - 476.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Burnard and B. A. Younker
Problem-Solving and Creativity: Insights from Students' Individual Composing Pathways
International Journal of Music Education,
April 1, 2004;
22(1):
59 - 76.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Huebner and S. C. Betts
Examining Fourth Generation Evaluation: Application to Positive Youth Development
Evaluation,
July 1, 1999;
5(3):
340 - 358.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Debates, Notes and Queries
Evaluation,
July 1, 1997;
3(3):
363 - 374.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Stern
Speeches and Addresses
Evaluation,
October 1, 1996;
2(4):
453 - 458.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|