Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rebien, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Participatory Evaluation of Development Assistance

Dealing with Power and Facilitative Learning

Claus C. Rebien

Copenhagen Business School

This article addresses two issues: the theoretical strengthening of the participatory evaluation concept, and the strengths and weaknesses in practice of this approach. It demonstrates how participatory evaluation can be strengthened conceptually and theoretically if based on fourth-generation evaluation and Giddens's structuration theory. Through an analysis of two evaluations in Zambia and Swaziland, strengths and weaknesses of applying the approach in practice are illustrated. The analysis includes elements from Foucault's theory on power, and from theories about decision-making and learning from political and organizational science. It concludes that, using a participatory evaluation approach, interaction and thus learning processes among stakeholders are initiated and facilitated, and that this benefits the ongoing project-implementation process. The characteristic asymmetrical relationship of power between donor and recipient is potentially ameliorated, allowing the less powerful a greater influence on the evaluation and the ensuing implementation process.

Evaluation, Vol. 2, No. 2, 151-171 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/135638909600200203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. A. Chouinard and J. B. Cousins
A Review and Synthesis of Current Research on Cross-Cultural Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2009; 30(4): 457 - 494.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
P.-M. Daigneault and S. Jacob
Toward Accurate Measurement of Participation: Rethinking the Conceptualization and Operationalization of Participatory Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2009; 30(3): 330 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
J. C. Suarez-Herrera, J. Springett, and C. Kagan
Critical Connections between Participatory Evaluation, Organizational Learning and Intentional Change in Pluralistic Organizations
Evaluation, July 1, 2009; 15(3): 321 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
P. A. Smits and F. Champagne
An Assessment of the Theoretical Underpinnings of Practical Participatory Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2008; 29(4): 427 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
J. Lennie
An Evaluation Capacity-Building Process for Sustainable Community IT Initiatives: Empowering and Disempowering Impacts
Evaluation, October 1, 2005; 11(4): 390 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
J. Bradley and S. Igras
Improving the quality of child health services: participatory action by providers
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 17(5): 391 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
S. Chacon-Moscoso, M. T. Anguera-Argilaga, J. A. Perez-Gil, and F. P. Holgado-Tello
A Mutual Catalytic Model of Formative Evaluation: The Interdependent Roles of Evaluators and Local Programme Practitioners
Evaluation, October 1, 2002; 8(4): 413 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
R. Murray
Citizens' Control of Evaluations: Formulating and Assessing Alternatives
Evaluation, January 1, 2002; 8(1): 81 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
T. A. Abma
Opening Thoughts
Evaluation, April 1, 2001; 7(2): 155 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
A. Gregory
Problematizing Participation: A Critical Review of Approaches to Participation in Evaluation Theory
Evaluation, April 1, 2000; 6(2): 179 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
C. Palfrey and P. Thomas
Politics and policy evaluation
Public Policy and Administration, October 1, 1999; 14(4): 58 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
G. Dabinett and T. Richardson
The European Spatial Approach: The Role of Power and Knowledge in Strategic Planning and Policy Evaluation
Evaluation, April 1, 1999; 5(2): 220 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. C. Greene
Evaluation as Advocacy
American Journal of Evaluation, February 1, 1997; 18(1): 25 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]