Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mihalache, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluation Networking in Romania

Roxana Mihalache

Pluriconsult Ltd, Romania, roxana{at}pluriconsult.ro

In the context of a growing evaluation community in Romania, networking in evaluation tends to be not only a topic for analysis and research, but mainly a practical tool for reaching the generic community of evaluation practitioners. Furthermore, this is a process requiring resources (time, dedicated people, information and funding) which are scarce. Therefore the better documented the process is, the higher the chances of achieving results. The process of networking in evaluation is of course influenced by the context in which it is taking place, mainly characterized by confusion around what evaluation really is and how it works and by confusion around what would be the roles and the benefits of networking in evaluation. In spite of these challenges there are some opportunities to justify this analysis, and probably the most relevant one is the interest of the members and stakeholders who realize the potential for the ‘soft’ but highly relevant contribution of networking to professional development in evaluation. In this context, the central authorities in Romania wanted to better understand networking in evaluation in order to identify how this process might be stimulated in the future, and the how Romanian Evaluation Association — EvalRom — came about.

Key Words: network in evaluation • community of practice • Working Group for Evaluation • voluntary networks • involuntary networks • EvalRom

Evaluation, Vol. 15, No. 4, 473-482 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1356389009345447


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?