| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Using Logic Analysis to Evaluate Knowledge Transfer InitiativesThe Case of the Research Collective on the Organization of Primary Care ServicesUniversité de Montréal, Canada, astrid.brousselle{at}umontreal.ca
Université de Montréal, Canada, damien.contandriopoulos{at}umontreal.ca
Université de Montréal, Canada, marc.lemire{at}umontreal.ca Models that shift more responsibility onto researchers for the process of incorporating research results into decision-making have greatly gained in popularity during the past two decades. This shift has created a new area of research to identify the best ways to transfer academic results into the organizational and political arenas. However, evaluating the utilization of information coming out of a knowledge transfer (KT) initiative remains an enormous challenge. This article demonstrates how logic analysis has proven to be a useful evaluation method to assess the utilization potential of KT initiatives. We present the case of the evaluation of the Research Collective on the Organization of Primary Care Services, an innovative experiment in knowledge synthesis and transfer. The conclusions focus not only on the utilization potential of results coming out of the Research Collective, but also on the theoretical framework used, in order to facilitate its application to the evaluation of other knowledge transfer initiatives.
Key Words: case study • evaluation • information utilization • knowledge transfer • logic analysis
Evaluation, Vol. 15, No. 2,
165-183 (2009) |
|||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
