Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pennisi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Scandizzo, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Economic Evaluation in an Age of Uncertainty

Giuseppe Pennisi

Advanced School of Public Administration, Italy, giuseppe.pennisi11{at}tin.it

Pasquale L. Scandizzo

University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Italy, scandizzo{at}uniroma2.it

Enabling value judgements about policies and programmes is one of evaluation's central tasks. There is, however, little consensus on how evaluators should accomplish this task. The traditional cost–benefit approaches have been found wanting and yet valuing as promoted by checklists or qualitative stakeholder interviews is not anchored to an economic theory and thus inspires little confidence. While no single methodology is likely to be accepted by all, recent developments in economic theory support a new interpretation. This article draws on economic evaluation generally and the evaluation of development projects more specifically. The approach proposes a variant of social cost–benefit analysis (SCBA); it retains the representation of stakeholder values and avoids the more dogmatic, and even mechanical, underpinnings of traditional economic analysis. The article traces the development of this new ‘options-based’ approach and suggests a path for further research. It is argued that this approach warrants a voice in the dialogue on economic evaluation.

Key Words: cost–benefit analysis • evaluation • real options • stakeholders • uncertainty

Evaluation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 77-94 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1356389006064174


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
G. Pennisi
Public management training economic analysis: a real options approach
International Review of Administrative Sciences, September 1, 2006; 72(3): 417 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]