Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forss, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tenden, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Chasing a Ghost?

An Essay on Participatory Evaluation and Capacity Development

Kim Forss

Andante – Tools for Thinking AB, Sweden, kim.forss{at}mailbox.swipnet.se

Stein-Erik Kruse

Centre for Health and Social Development (HeSo), Norway, stein.erik.kruse{at}heso.no

Sandy Taut

University of California Los Angeles, USA, staut{at}ucla.edu

Edle Tenden

UNESCO, Vietnam, e.tenden{at}unesco.org

UNESCO has high ambitions with respect to the use of evaluation. But for evaluation to flourish it has to be valued and understood in the whole organization, not only by top management and the specialized evaluation service. There are many ways to foster evaluation capacity; one approach is to involve stakeholders in evaluation processes so they can learn by doing. This essay describes how an external evaluation of UNESCO's response to the HIV/AIDS pandemic was designed to encourage capacity development through participation. Learning did occur, but not where it was expected to occur, and not to the extent hoped for. The authors found that practical issues, such as timing, skills, team composition, structure of budgets, and incentive systems, must be designed for capacity development so that the learning process becomes an explicit and realistic goal; good intentions do not suffice, as many other pressures arise during an evaluation.

Key Words: capacity development • evaluation capacity building • organizational learning • participatory evaluation • process use

Evaluation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 128-144 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1356389006064190


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EvaluationHome page
J. C. Suarez-Herrera, J. Springett, and C. Kagan
Critical Connections between Participatory Evaluation, Organizational Learning and Intentional Change in Pluralistic Organizations
Evaluation, July 1, 2009; 15(3): 321 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
H. Preskill and S. Boyle
A Multidisciplinary Model of Evaluation Capacity Building
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2008; 29(4): 443 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]