Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluating the Comprehensive Development Framework in Kyrgyz Republic, Central Asia

Magic Bullet or White Elephant?

Colin Jacobs

British Council, UK, colin.jacobs{at}britishcouncil.org

The Comprehensive Development Framework (CDF) is an important tool for long-term development of any country. It attempts to balance state, public, private and donor interests into a single 10-year planning framework. Attempts to learn from experience of using the model have been gathered by the World Bank in almost 50 low-income pilot countries. These identify some of the benefits and constraints. This article takes the example of Kyrgyz Republic in Central Asia where the CDF approach was introduced in 2001. The research is based on interim findings from a donor-funded project to assist the strengthening of the CDF. This assessment notes the way in which the CDF has been used to promote national identity and only latterly been more closely integrated with the National Poverty Reduction Strategy, which has a three-year plan. The range of stakeholders remains wide, putting pressure on the coordinating authority within the President’s Office. Important implications for monitoring and evaluation methodologies are drawn through pilot research in two districts. The need for local participation and bottom-up approaches is critical in order to balance the over-centralized approach of the past. Issues of capacity, including skills and systems for the coordinating body and other stakeholders, are crucial when considering what will work.

Key Words: Comprehensive Development Framework • Kyrgyz Republic • National Poverty Reduction Strategy • participatory models • public sector

Evaluation, Vol. 11, No. 4, 480-495 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1356389005060264


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?