Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackenzie, M.
Right arrow Articles by Blamey, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Practice and the Theory

Lessons from the Application of a Theories of Change Approach

Mhairi Mackenzie

University of Glasgow, UK, m.mackenzie{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk

Avril Blamey

University of Glasgow, UK, a.blamey{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk

Theory-based evaluation approaches are becoming increasingly popular in the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives. Such an approach, Theory of Change (ToC), has been used in the external evaluations of two of four Scottish Health Demonstration projects. This article provides an empirically based analysis of the issues raised in the process of articulating a project’s ToC. It then considers the value of the approach in relation to sharpening planning, providing formative feedback, improving performance management, guiding internal and external evaluation, judging impact and reducing problems of attribution. A conclusion is reached that, whilst such approaches are by no means a panacea, they offer one useful framework within which to negotiate a range of evaluation practice decisions.

Key Words: child health improvement • complex community • interventions • heart health improvement • Scottish Health Demonstration • projects • theory-based evaluation

Evaluation, Vol. 11, No. 2, 151-168 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1356389005055538
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EvaluationHome page
D. Hart, G. Diercks-O'Brien, and A. Powell
Exploring Stakeholder Engagement in Impact Evaluation Planning in Educational Development Work
Evaluation, July 1, 2009; 15(3): 285 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
A. Blamey and M. Mackenzie
Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation: Peas in a Pod or Apples and Oranges?
Evaluation, October 1, 2007; 13(4): 439 - 455.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
A. Sampson
Developing Robust Approaches to Evaluating Social Programmes
Evaluation, October 1, 2007; 13(4): 477 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J Public HealthHome page
K. Judge and L. Bauld
Learning from Policy Failure? Health Action Zones in England
Eur J Public Health, August 1, 2006; 16(4): 341 - 343.
[Full Text] [PDF]