Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Scale, Complexity and the Representation of Theories of Change

Part II

Rick Davies

Monitoring and Evaluation Consultant, UK, rick{at}mande.co.uk

Because of the global scale and diversity of their work, international aid agencies face major problems when attempting to represent their plans and evaluate their achievements. In this second of two articles looking at types of change processes, the focus is on complex processes of change that include mutual influence, parallel processes and feedback loops. Four practically oriented arguments are put forward for using a network perspective to represent these processes: the broad applicability of a network framework, its scalability, the range of measurement and descriptive tools available and the multidisciplinary body of theory and research available to inform agencies’ theories of change. Networks are then contrasted with hierarchies as background metaphors, and implications are identified for the monitoring and evaluation of development projects. In this article relevant examples have been drawn from the author’s consultancy experience with development aid programmes in Bangladesh and Ghana.

Key Words: complexity • networks • representation • scale • theory • of change

Evaluation, Vol. 11, No. 2, 133-149 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1356389005055528
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EvaluationHome page
L. Horelli
Network Evaluation from the Everyday Life Perspective: A Tool for Capacity-Building and Voice
Evaluation, April 1, 2009; 15(2): 205 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
S. Sharkey and A. Sharples
From the Beginning: Negotiation in Community Evaluation
Evaluation, July 1, 2008; 14(3): 363 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
P. J. Rogers
Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions
Evaluation, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 29 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]