This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kautto, P. Articles by Similä, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Recently Introduced Policy Instruments and Intervention Theories

Finnish Environment Institute, Finland, Petrus.Kautto{at}ymparisto.fi

Jukka Similä

Finnish Environment Institute, Finland, Jukka.Simila{at}ymparisto.fi

Evaluation of recently introduced policy instruments (RIPIs) is especially problematic, because only some effects have occurred, and information on them is imperfect. Policy makers and the public at large are, however, particularly interested in early evaluations. This article examines problems with the retrospective evaluation of RIPIs, and explores the advantages of using intervention theories in these evaluations. Two case studies from the field of environmental policy instruments are used as examples. It is argued that when evidence on final outcomes is largely unavailable, an intervention theory is a useful tool to overcome information problems. By using intervention theories, it is possible to identify observable prerequisites that precede intended, but not yet occurred, outcomes.

Key Words: policy instrument • program theory • ‘recently introduced policy instruments’ evaluation • regulation

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?