This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mark, M. M. Articles by Henry, G. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Mechanisms and Outcomes of Evaluation Influence

Pennsylvania State University, USA

Gary T. Henry

Georgia State University, USA

Past literature has identified several putative precursors of use, as well as alternative forms of use. However, important shortcomings still exist in previous work on use. In particular, inadequate attention has been given to the underlying processes that may mediate the effects of evaluation on attitude and action. In essence, a key part of the theory of change for evaluation itself is missing. To help fill this gap, we describe a framework designed to capture key mechanisms through which evaluation may have its effects. The framework includes change processes that have been validated in various social science literatures. It identifies three levels of analysis (individual, interpersonal and collective), each with four kinds of processes (general influence, attitudinal, motivational and behavioral). With a more comprehensive view of the mechanisms underlying evaluation’s influence, the field can move forward in relation to its understanding and facilitation of evaluation’s role in the service of social betterment.

Key Words: evaluation outcomes • evaluation theory • evaluation use • influence • mechanisms

Evaluation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 35-57 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1356389004042326


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Johnson, L. O. Greenseid, S. A. Toal, J. A. King, F. Lawrenz, and B. Volkov Research on Evaluation Use: A Review of the Empirical Literature From 1986 to 2005 American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2009; 30(3): 377 - 410. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Suarez-Herrera, J. Springett, and C. Kagan Critical Connections between Participatory Evaluation, Organizational Learning and Intentional Change in Pluralistic Organizations Evaluation, July 1, 2009; 15(3): 321 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Balthasar Institutional Design and Utilization of Evaluation: A Contribution to a Theory of Evaluation Influence Based on Swiss Experience Eval Rev, June 1, 2009; 33(3): 226 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Horelli Network Evaluation from the Everyday Life Perspective: A Tool for Capacity-Building and Voice Evaluation, April 1, 2009; 15(2): 205 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Diaz-Puente, A. C. Montero, and I. de los Rios Carmenado Empowering communities through evaluation: some lessons from rural Spain Community Dev. J., January 1, 2009; 44(1): 53 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Hanssen, F. Lawrenz, and D. O. Dunet Concurrent Meta-Evaluation: A Critique American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2008; 29(4): 572 - 582. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Balthasar The Effects of Institutional Design on the Utilization of Evaluation: Evidenced Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) Evaluation, July 1, 2006; 12(3): 353 - 371. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. H. Weiss, E. Murphy-Graham, and S. Birkeland An Alternate Route to Policy Influence: How Evaluations Affect D.A.R.E. American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2005; 26(1): 12 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. Cousins Commentary: Minimizing Evaluation Misuse as Principled Practice American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2004; 25(3): 391 - 397. [PDF]