Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Scale, Complexity and the Representation of Theories of Change

Rick Davies

Monitoring and Evaluation Consultant, UK

International aid agencies face major problems when attempting to evaluate their achievements. Activities, intended beneficiaries, partner institutions and social contexts are diverse because of their global scale. How can agencies’ ‘theories of change’ be adequately represented in summary forms that respect the complexity and diversity? This article, the first of two, looks at a range of types of change processes and how they can be represented. It starts with linear processes, traditionally represented via the Logical Framework, and ends with network processes. The solutions proposed are informed by three related cross-disciplinary theoretical perspectives: evolutionary theory; complex adaptive systems; and social network analysis. Examples draw on the author’s consultancy experience with international development aid programmes in Vietnam, Bangladesh, Cameroon and Burkina Faso.

Key Words: complexity • logical framework • representation • scale • theories of change

Evaluation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 101-121 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1356389004043124
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EvaluationHome page
L. Horelli
Network Evaluation from the Everyday Life Perspective: A Tool for Capacity-Building and Voice
Evaluation, April 1, 2009; 15(2): 205 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
P. J. Rogers
Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions
Evaluation, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 29 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
R. Davies
Scale, Complexity and the Representation of Theories of Change: Part II
Evaluation, April 1, 2005; 11(2): 133 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]